Publishing listicles just to rank in AI search isn't the smartest move.

I get why everyone's doing it. In Ahrefs' study of ChatGPT responses across 750 recommendation prompts, "best X" blog lists made up 43.8% of all the page types cited. Research from Scrunch found that roughly 30% of the comparison pages in its AI-cited sample ranked their own publisher first.

So yes, listicles get cited, but the person reading them still has a decision to make 馃檪

Google's guidance on writing high quality reviews asks you to explain your choices, provide evidence and discuss benefits and drawbacks. A listicle is basically a set of mini reviews, so the same logic applies.

What a public methodology does

A methodology shows:

  • What qualified each option
  • How it was evaluated
  • Why it earned its place, including your own brand

The 6-stage framework I use

1Define what "best" means

An enterprise's best fit can be the wrong choice for a small team. I start with a specific reader and decision: who is choosing, what they need to accomplish, which budgets or requirements matter and which options belong in the comparison.

2Establish what qualifies an option

I set inclusion requirements before comparing anything. Every option needs to be relevant to the audience, have the essential capabilities, be backed by verified information and fit the reader's needs.

3Set criteria before scoring

The criteria depend on what you're comparing. For software I might look at features, usability, integrations and total cost. For service providers it's experience, capacity, security and engagement model. For physical products it's performance, durability, usability and value for money.

4Connect claims to evidence

An advertised capability doesn't prove performance, and missing information doesn't prove poor quality. I keep track of sources, verification dates and research limitations, and I'm clear about what comes from firsthand testing, third-party evidence, the provider itself or my own editorial judgment.

5Evaluate your own company consistently

If your company appears, disclose the relationship and apply the same standards to everyone. Competitors get comparable research, your limitations are included and the evidence should be able to place another company first. This is the part most brands skip 馃檪

6Explain, verify and update

I publish a short methodology inside the listicle (or link to a fuller one), explain who each option suits and revisit the list when important evidence changes. Freshness matters here too: in the same Ahrefs research, 79.1% of the 1,100 cited blog lists they checked had been updated in 2025.

The full PDF has the criteria examples, the evidence table and my pre-publish checklist.

Download the free PDF

Keeping your listicles honest over time

A listicle is never really finished. Prices change, features ship and new options appear. When it's time to revisit one, I use the same decision process I explain in Refresh, Rewrite, Merge or Leave It Alone. And if you want first-hand evaluation that actually holds up, my SME interview process helps a lot. You can also see how listicles fit into my AEO and GEO work for AI search.